What a Buyer Sees That You Don't

Dave Goerlich

You've probably thought about an eventual exit. Most owners meet a buyer's questions for the first time in diligence, when there's no time left to fix anything. Those same questions, asked now and worked through in small steps, make the business clearer to run today, whether you ever sell or not.

Under Inspection

You've probably thought about how this ends. Another email from another M&A group just landed in your inbox, asking if you've considered your options or claiming they have a buyer looking for exactly your type of business. Someone at a peer group dinner mentions they just sold, or that they've started talking to a firm.

Knowing that some kind of exit will eventually happen and actively preparing for one are very different things. The exit is a someday event. Today is about running the business: getting orders out the door, keeping customers happy, and finding the next stretch of growth. Why prepare for an exam nobody has scheduled?

Because the exam doesn't test anything exotic. It tests what you already do every day, graded by someone who hasn't gotten used to it yet.

Diligence can be overwhelming. It's a ton of work, and it reaches into corners of the business you haven't looked at in years. A few of the questions are surprisingly simple, though. How quickly can you tell me what happened last month? How much work goes into the reports you run the business on? Where does your customer history live, and who has the keys? None of that is hard to ask. It's uncomfortable to answer because you stopped asking it years ago.

The Normal You Stopped Seeing

Every growing company collects workarounds, and each one made perfect sense the day it showed up. The systems didn't talk to each other, so somebody built a spreadsheet to bridge them. It worked, so it stayed. Then came another one. Nobody ever decided the month-end close should take two or three weeks. It drifted there one reconciliation at a time, until three weeks felt like how long a close takes.

A buyer doesn't have that history. A buyer sees a company that won't know whether October was profitable until the week before Thanksgiving.

Reporting follows the same pattern. If your monthly package takes someone most of a week to assemble (pulling exports, pasting them into a workbook, repairing the formulas that broke since last month), you're paying a person-week for every report. You're also making decisions on numbers that were already stale when they landed on your desk. To you, that's part of someone's job. To an outsider, it's a data problem with a salary attached.

Customer history is easier to miss. Think about your best customer: the pricing you agreed to three years ago, the exceptions you've granted along the way, the order that went sideways and how you made it right. In a lot of companies, all of that lives in one person's inbox and one person's memory. Say that person is Mark, and Mark is excellent. A buyer isn't questioning whether Mark is good at his job. They're asking whether someone with Mark's background could walk in Monday and do it without him. If the answer is no, the relationship belongs to Mark. It doesn't belong to the business.

Same Audit, Different Reason

Every question on that list is one you could ask yourself this week. You don't need a sale on the horizon to justify it. A buyer's only real advantage is fresh eyes, and fresh eyes are the one thing you can borrow without a transaction.

Run the math from your side of the desk. A buyer notices the three-week close once. You live with it twelve times a year, making every pricing, hiring, and inventory call on last month's picture while this month's is already moving. The person-week of reporting isn't a line in someone else's analysis. It's roughly a quarter of one employee's year, every year, spent producing numbers instead of acting on them.

The customer history in one inbox isn't just a diligence finding, either. It's a retention risk sitting in plain sight. A resignation, a long illness, or a competitor with a better offer turns it into a customer conversation you aren't equipped to have.

Timing is what turns all of this into a scramble. In a diligence process, you're digging all of it up on the buyer's calendar, answering request after request in a short window while still running the business. Anything you find, you'll have to explain. There's little time to fix it.

It takes a toll that never shows up in the numbers, too. When someone else is asking, every gap feels like a wrong answer on an exam you're being graded on in real time. One wrong answer is uncomfortable. A string of them, about the business you've spent years building, starts to feel like failing. That anxiety lands at exactly the moment you most need a clear head.

Doing it now, you set the pace, and the same work feels completely different. You can take one question at a time, work through it in small chunks, and fix what you find as you go. The close tightens by a few days, the monthly report loses a manual step, and customer notes move out of Mark's inbox one account at a time. Nobody is grading any of it. Each fix is just the company getting better, today, for you.

Sellable and Clear Are the Same Project

Getting ready to be sellable and running a clearer operation turn out to be the same work. A close that finishes in days, reporting that mostly assembles itself, customer knowledge the business owns instead of borrows.

I've asked this one many times: what would you pay more for, a box of LEGO blocks, or a full LEGO set, complete with instructions? The pieces might be identical. The set is worth more because anyone can build what's on the box without the person who designed it standing there. Better systems and documentation do the same thing for a business. A buyer sees that difference right away. So does the owner who never sells, every time something gets built without them.

If you sell someday, the prep is done. If a successor takes over, they inherit a business that runs on systems instead of on whoever happens to remember. If you keep it another twenty years, you spend those years deciding on this month's numbers, not last month's.

Start by looking at it the way a stranger would. How many business days after month-end before you trust the numbers? How many hours does the monthly report cost, and whose hours are they? Which customer relationships would wobble if one person gave notice tomorrow? Write the answers down. Read them back as if you'd never seen this company before. Then pick one and start.

The Quilt Check

If you want a more structured version of that outside view, the Quilt Check takes about ten minutes and scores your operation across seven dimensions.

The buyer's questions aren't going to change. The only thing you control is whether you hear them first.

Contents

  1. The Normal You Stopped Seeing
  2. Same Audit, Different Reason
  3. Sellable and Clear Are the Same Project

Tags

Next Article

New tool bad data
Dave Goerlich

Your New Planning Tool Won't Fix Bad Data. It'll Make Wrong Decisions Faster, and With More Confidence.

AI-powered planning tools don't fix bad data. They amplify it, generating wrong purchase orders faster and with more apparent confidence than the manual process they replaced. Below roughly 85% BOM and inventory accuracy, the tool stops helping and starts working against you, and teams don't catch it right away. A couple months in, once the pattern of wrong orders is undeniable, they quietly start keeping a parallel spreadsheet again.

Read More

This post was last updated on: Sep 30, 2026.